Move over Stedman, Oprah’s got someone else in mind for her date to the Oscars.

At Thursday’s Essence Black Women in Hollywood luncheon, “Precious” star Gabourey Sidibe told People that Oprah, herself, had offered Sidibe a lift to the Academy Awards.

“Oprah called me and was like, ‘Hey girl, do you want to ride together?’ ” Sidibe said. “I was like, ‘I got it Oprah, calm down. I don’t want to show up with you. People will think we’re too cool.”

Don’t get her wrong. It’s not that the 26-year-old nominee for Best Actress wouldn’t love some alone time with the talk show queen (who’s also the co-producer of “Precious”). She just hasn’t warmed up to sharing the spotlight with the likes of Oprah, just yet.

“She’s the only person that I’m continually star-struck by,” Sidibe told People. “When I meet people I get used to them very quickly because everyone seems like a friend because I watch them on TV. But Oprah is the only one I can’t get used to.”

Meanwhile, Oprah is clearly a fan of the rising star, as well. According to NYtimes.com, The Oprah Winfrey Network announced Monday that it has acquired the TV rights to “Precious.”

If all of us huffy Oscar “experts” remain so smug about “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” being a front-runner in many top categories, where’s the actual support within the academy, eh? Attendance was modest at its recent, official academy screening at the Samuel Goldwyn Theater. By contrast, the place was packed last week to cheer a film that really has no shot at a best-picture bid: Michael Jackson’s documentary “This Is It.”

As Steve Pond reported yesterday at TheWrap, “Precious” “played well, with the largest applause going to the film’s lead actresses, Gabourey Sidibe and Mo’Nique. (Director Lee Daniels, in contrast, reportedly didn’t prompt as much enthusiasm.) The size of the crowd suggests to me that the film’s biggest problem will be getting Oscar voters to see it.” Pond put attendance at 300. A separate report I heard claimed the body count was slightly less than 500 at a theater with about 1,000 seats.

Either way, Steve’s right. “Precious” may have deafening Oscar buzz, but it hasn’t caught on big time within the academy yet. That sets up a fascinating situation that must seem weird to casual Oscar watchers observing the derby from the sidelines. On one hand, they see swarms of award pundits shouting, “Precious’! ‘Precious’! Oscar! Oscar!” while voters yawn, “Ho-hum … I can’t be bothered to attend a screening to see it.”

Surely, the Oscar watchers must think quietly to themselves: have the pundits finally gone bonkers? We should believe them?

Answer: Yes, believe us. Because we’re right. Stay tuned. When this derby plays out, you will have all the proof you’ll ever need that we Oscarologists actually know our stuff — that we’re smarter than real Oscar voters.

The reason 5,500 Oscar voters didn’t show up for the screening is because they know that the flick is a dramatic downer about vicious ghetto trash. They’ll catch up with it later when the DVD is shipped to their homes and their curiosity grows in equal proportion to the dizzying buzz building nationwide for “Precious” as it rolls out to more and more theaters, setting off waves of huzzahs.

Then, after they see it, they’ll give it lots of top nominations. We pundits know that because it’s the only movie in the derby so far that triggers the same fanatic response as last year’s feel-bad ghetto flick that went on to win best picture. “Precious” is “Slumdog Millionaire” without the big song-and-dance finale.